Mccartney Q. Forbes

Mccartney Q. Forbes

Mccartney Q. Forbes
Badge #3750, Black Male
Sergeant at Transit Bureau Bronx/Queens since September 2025
Also served at Transit Bureau District 2, 79th Precinct, Transit Bureau Response Team
Service started October 2018, made $205,000 last year, Tax #966577

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Hit against inanimate object
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera (3)
Abuse of Authority: Other
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29017
Closed: 12/3/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$17,500   Fraser, Trent vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 KCSC KCSC 505750/2021
$15,000   Jones, Michael vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 513317/2020
View Details

Complaints

12 Complaints
32 Allegations
10 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
6 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4 Complainant Unavailable
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 SRAD Closure
8 Unable to Determine
7 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202512146, November 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202505253, May 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202503356, March 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202412475, December 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished) / Instructions
additional details

Complaint #202305967, June 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Misleading official statement
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202305728, June 2023
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202302768, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202204384, July 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202203588, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202202953, May 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202106893, November 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202101713, March 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202512146, November 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 35-39 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202505253, May 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 25-29 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202503356, March 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Action Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202412475, December 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Warned and Admonished) / Instructions
additional details
Complaint #202305967, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Misleading official statement Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202305728, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Age 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202302768, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202204384, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black, 30-34 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202203588, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 21-24 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 21-24 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202202953, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202106893, November 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202101713, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Restricted Breathing Black Male, 45-49 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29017
Closed: 12/3/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to properly secure prisoner inside the prisoner van
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: No disciplinary action


Lawsuits

Named in 7 known lawsuits, $32,500 total settlements.

Bowers, Daquan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 512212/2026, Supreme Court - Kings, May 28, 2026

Childress, Larry vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 522186/2025, Supreme Court - Kings, October 23, 2025

Mccoy, Michael vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 522195/2025, Supreme Court - Kings, October 23, 2025

Campbell, Chad vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 511447/2025, Supreme Court - Kings, April 8, 2025

Downing, Virginia vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 513878/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, May 20, 2024
Complaint
Description: On February 21, 2023, the Plaintiff received a worried call from his 16-year-old son, who asked her to come downstairs from her apartment building. She did so and found her son pushed against a police car, surrounded by approximately five Police Officers. She repeatedly asked them what was going on, but they replied that she had to wait without providing any other information. The Police Officers then handcuffed her son, and one of them punched him in the face and side, and kneed him. The Plaintiff repeatedly asked why they were arresting her son, pleading with them to stop because he was only 16, but nobody listened to her. Instead, one of the Defendants pushed her and told her to move away. She complied, movi...

Fraser, Trent vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 505750/2021, Supreme Court - Kings, April 12, 2021, ended May 7, 2026
$17,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 19, 2019, Plaintiff Trent Fraser was visiting a friend in his apartment when Defendant Police Officers McCartney Forbes, NYPD officers John and Jane Does #1-8, and other yet unknown police officers entered the premises with guns drawn on the individuals inside the basement apartment. Defendants purported that Plaintiff Fraser committed trespass when Plaintiff entered lawfully with his friend, Robert, who resided in the apartment and had a key. Prior to his arrest, Plaintiff Fraser explained to defendant officers that he was an authorized guest in the building and his friend Robert had gone to the store and would return shortly, but officers would not wait for him to return. Defendants simply cuffed Pl...

Jones, Michael vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 513317/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, July 30, 2020, ended August 19, 2021
$15,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 21, 2020, at approximately 10:00pm, Plaintiff was lawfully present in the vicinity of Kosciuzcko Street and Marcy Avenue, Brooklyn, when the Defendant police officers, including NYPD Officer Forbes, unlawfully handcuffed and falsely arrested Plaintiff without probable cause, or any legal justification. Plaintiff had left his cell phone in his cousin's car at the above location. After opening the car door and retrieving his cell phone, the Defendant officers grabbed Plaintiff and began searching him without permission or authority. Defendant officers then handcuffed Plaintiff and transported him to the 79th Precinct and Kings County Central Booking. Plaintiff was released from Central Booking with no ch...

Other Documents