Gabriel Perezponce

Gabriel Perezponce

Gabriel Perezponce
Badge #21361, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 7th Precinct since February 2018
Service started January 2017, made $165,000 last year, Tax #963187

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Restricted Breathing

Complaints

6 Complaints
11 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202509697, September 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202204591, July 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202101809, March 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Asian, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202101536, March 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202008013, August 2020
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202101092, February 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, October 2, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 30 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #202509697, September 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 30-34 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202204591, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force White Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Female, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202101809, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Asian, 65-69 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202101536, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Hispanic Female, 25-29 Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 25-29 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202008013, August 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Restricted Breathing Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 35-39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202101092, February 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Hispanic Male, 25-29 Exonerated
Force: Restricted Breathing Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, October 2, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 30 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Simmon, Servisio vs Policer Officer Perezpone, Gabriel, et al.
Case # 157840/2023, Supreme Court - New York, January 3, 2024, ended April 28, 2025
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On August 07, 2020, plaintiff Servisio Simmon was placed under arrest on suspicion of robbery. On August 08, 2020, Plaintiff woke-up in a cell and informed an Police Officer that he felt suicidal and the officer stated they were working on it. Plaintiff was later interrogated and informed about his potential life in prison. Plaintiff began to suffer a mental health crisis and started to hang himself with his pants. Plaintiff was thrown against his cell by Police Officers and forcefully injected with a substance. Plaintiff felt his wrist snap as he was becoming unconscious.

Other Documents