Steven M. Tatar

Steven M. Tatar

Steven M. Tatar
Badge #5095, White Male
Sergeant at 62nd Precinct since April 2026
Service started July 2015, made $194,000 last year, Tax #959287

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Question

Lawsuit Settlements:
$3,000   Azam, Naveed vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 EDNY EDNY 21CV03499
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
13 Allegations
3 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
6 Closed - Pending Litigation
3 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202405218, May 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202307344, July 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, May 5, 2026
additional details

Complaint #202301937, February 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Puerto Rican Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Puerto Rican Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Puerto Rican Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202204662, July 2022
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202104054, September 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Asian Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202405218, May 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202307344, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, May 5, 2026
additional details
Complaint #202301937, February 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Puerto Rican Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Question Puerto Rican Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Puerto Rican Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202204662, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202104054, September 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Asian Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Gun Pointed Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
Discourtesy: Word Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $3,000 total settlements.

Reynolds, Lyman vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 539054/2025, Supreme Court - Kings, November 17, 2025

Johnson, Rhondaya vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 503857/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, February 13, 2024
Complaint
Description: On February 25, 2022, around 10:30 p.m., Plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle that was stopped by NYPD officers, including Defendant Tatar and Officer John Doe, near Mermaid Avenue and 33rd Street in Brooklyn. The driver was arrested for a traffic violation, and Plaintiff, the vehicle owner, refused to give consent to search the vehicle. Upset by the refusal, Defendant Tatar took the Plaintiff's vehicle without permission and drove it to the 60th Precinct, leaving Plaintiff stranded. Upon arriving at the precinct, Plaintiff found that her vehicle had been unlawfully searched. Plaintiff alleges that this seizure and search were unconstitutional and part of a broader NYPD practice.

Azam, Naveed vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV03499, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 22, 2021, ended May 9, 2022
$3,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 12, 2020, Plaintiff was driving his vehicle with two passengers in Kings County, New York. Unmarked NYPD vehicles tried to pull over Plaintiff’s vehicle. When Plaintiff eventually pulled over, NYPD officers—including Ronald Louie and Steven Tater—surrounded the vehicle. The officers forcibly removed Plaintiff from his vehicle, slamming him face first into the ground. The officers then punched Plaintiff in the face and kicked him in the head, causing Plaintiff to lose consciousness. Plaintiff woke in the holding cell of a precinct, with pain all over his body and blood coming from his face. Plaintiff demanded immediate medical treatment and an ambulance. Hours later, an ambulance arrived and Plainti...

Garaz, Vitaly vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 517287/2019, Supreme Court - Kings, August 23, 2019
Complaint
Description: On or about December 17th, 2018, Plaintiff was lawfully present when he was approached by PO Steven Tatar of the NYPD. Plaintiff was stopped, searched, and handcuffed by PO Tatar. PO Tatar did not read Plaintiff his legal rights and refused to inform him why he was being arrested. Plaintiff was then taken to the local precinct where he was photographed, fingerprinted, and detained in a holding cell. PO Tatar then falsely and maliciously instigated the commencement of the criminal prosecution of Plaintiff. As a result of the reckless and negligent manner in which PO Tatar falsely arrested and imprisoned him, Plaintiff has sustained permanent physical, psychological and emotional harm.

Rentas, George, and Acevedo, Angel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 521154/2018, Supreme Court - Kings, October 29, 2018
Complaint
Description: On May 4, 2018, Plaintiffs George Rentas and Angel Acevedo were falsely arrested by ten unidentified NYPD officers while on the Coney Island Boardwalk between West 15th Street and Stillwell Avenue in Brooklyn, NY. The complaint does not state the specific circumstances that led to the arrest and only states that the Plaintiffs were arrested "without reasonable suspicion or probable cause to believe that Plaintiffs committed a crime." The Plaintiffs were held for three days before being released when the DA's office refused to prosecute.

Other Documents