Damian J. Weber

Damian J. Weber

Damian J. Weber
Badge #25697, White Male
Police Officer at 28th Precinct since October 2020
Service started January 2019, made $157,000 last year, Tax #967387

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Abuse of Authority: Sexual Misconduct (Sexual Humiliation)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Offensive Language: Sexual orientation

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26365
Closed: 12/1/2022
Case: 2022-25910
Closed: 10/12/2022
Case: 2022-25909
Closed: 5/27/2022

View Details

Complaints

8 Complaints
21 Allegations
9 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
6 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202602930, March 2026
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202600852, January 2026
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202503025, March 2025
Allegation: Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sexual Misconduct (Sexual Humiliation)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202406015, June 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202305398, April 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202207593, November 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202100465, January 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 20, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #202003791, May 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, March 11, 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202602930, March 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202600852, January 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 21-24 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202503025, March 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Sexual orientation Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Sexual Misconduct (Sexual Humiliation) Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202406015, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202305398, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Female, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 10-14 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202207593, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Female, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Female Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202100465, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Black Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Gun Pointed Black Female, 40-44 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Female, 40-44 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 20, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details
Complaint #202003791, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, March 11, 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26365
Closed: 12/1/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful threat of force.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully used offensive language.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2022-25910
Closed: 10/12/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely activate body worn camera.
Recommendation: No disciplinary action

Case: 2022-25909
Closed: 5/27/2022
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: -
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits.

Stewart, Jysean & De Jesus, Marcus vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 164359/2025, Supreme Court - New York, December 30, 2025

Simpson, Matthew vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV07775, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 30, 2025, ended May 6, 2026
Zero Disposition

Perry, Christopher Jr. & Perry, Christopher vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 162289/2024, Supreme Court - New York, December 30, 2024
Complaint
Description: On June 16, 2024, plaintiffs were lawfully present in the vicinity of Lenox Avenue and West 119th Street, County of New York. POs Ashfaqur Rahman, Sohral Peerzada, Walter Mancilla, Arun Prashad, Matthew Grieve, Damien Weber, and unnamed POs, without probable cause, an arrest warrant, or any legal justification, stopped, seized, searched, and arrested plaintiffs. Plaintiffs were then falsely and maliciously prosecuted and required to make numerous court appearances, until all charges against them were terminated favorably. Plaintiffs sustained physical and emotional pain and injuries as a result of this incident.

Other Documents