Lawsuit Settlements:
$8,501 Tan, Donovan vs City of New York, et al., 2016 EDNY EDNY 16CV00028
View Details
$8,501 Tan, Donovan vs City of New York, et al., 2016 EDNY EDNY 16CV00028
View Details
Timothy V. Magliente
Deputy Inspector at Central Park Precinct since October 2024
Also served at
10th Precinct,
Patrol Borough Manhattan South,
Internal Affairs Bureau,
121st Precinct
Service
started July 2006,
made $194,000 last year,
Tax #942097
White Male
Complaints
2
Complaints
3
Allegations
0
Substantiated
2
Complainant Uncooperative
1
SRAD Closure
Complaint #202607165,
June 2026
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #201603701,
April 2016
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Nonlethal restraining device |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 27 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 27 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Complaint #202607165, June 2026 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Male, 35-39 | SRAD Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201603701, April 2016 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Nonlethal restraining device | Black Male, 27 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 27 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $8,501 total settlements.Tan, Donovan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV00028, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 15, 2016, ended September 15, 2016
$8,501 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was standing on the block around NYCHA housing when Defendant officers asked for his ID. Plaintiff said it was in his house so the officers handcuffed him, assaulted him, took him to the 122nd Precinct, and charged him with Dis Con, Resisting Arrest, and OGA, which were ACD'D.
Schopen, Robert vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 102172/2012, Supreme Court - New York, March 14, 2012, ended September 19, 2018
Zero Disposition