Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $30,000 total settlements.
Glover, Walter vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 522614/2025,
Supreme Court - Kings, July 15, 2025
Bennett, Fitzroy vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 535493/2024,
Supreme Court - Kings, January 7, 2025, ended June 15, 2026
$30,000 Settlement
Hill, Rondel vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 512923/2024,
Supreme Court - Kings, May 30, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about July 22, 2023, Rondel Hill was allegedly unlawfully stopped, searched, arrested, and detained by NYPD Officer Joel Torres and other unidentified officers in Brooklyn, New York. Hill was accused of criminal acts without probable cause, during which officers used excessive force, including tightly applying handcuffs and dragging him, causing bruises, swelling, and significant pain. Hill was detained for approximately 26 hours, subjected to strip searches, cavity inspections, and interrogations without legal representation.
Hill claims his arrest was racially motivated and that false information was provided to initiate criminal prosecution. The charges were eventually dismissed on October 26, 2023. H...