Vicente E. Perez

Lieutenant Special Assignment at Patrol Borough Manhattan North Community Response Team since February 2024
Also served at 46th Precinct Detective Squad, 33rd Precinct, Narcotics Borough Bronx, 32nd Precinct
Service started January 2008, made $272,000 last year, Tax #946108
Hispanic Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Detention
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) (2)

Lawsuit Settlements:
$20,000   Vasquez, Marco vs City of New York, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 030630/2020E
$55,000   Brooks, Andre, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2013 SDNY SDNY 13CV07495
$90,000   Fort, Andrew vs City of New York, et al., 2012 BCSC BCSC 306368/2012
View Details

Complaints

12 Complaints
28 Allegations
5 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
3 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
2 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated
7 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202500441, January 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Detention
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Detention
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day) / Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202500453, December 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202411840, November 2024
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202406362, April 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: American Indian Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202402053, February 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202309736, October 2023
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details

Complaint #202307662, August 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202310128, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Dominican Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202302201, March 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #201900444, January 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201901127, January 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 32
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201409238, August 2014
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202500441, January 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Detention Age 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Age 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Detention Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day) / Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202500453, December 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Black Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 21-24 Unfounded
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202411840, November 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Vehicle Black Male, 30-34 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202406362, April 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched American Indian Male, 35-39 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202402053, February 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202309736, October 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Vehicle Black Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Penalty: Command Discipline - B (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details
Complaint #202307662, August 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 18-20 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202310128, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Dominican Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202302201, March 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #201900444, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201901127, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Hispanic Male, 32 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Hispanic Male, 32 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 32 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201409238, August 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 30 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 6 known lawsuits, $165,000 total settlements.

Melton, Darryl vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 163183/2025, Supreme Court - New York, November 25, 2025

Mercado, Samuel et al. vs City of Ny et al.
Case # 814604/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 29, 2021
Complaint
Description: On January 24, 2018, at approximately 1:00 a.m., inside the residential premises of 1715 Longfellow Avenue, The Bronx, New York, Plaintiffs, Mr. SAMUEL MERCADO and Ms. MARIBEL RIVERA, were illegally stopped, searched, seized, arrested and detained by defendants, police officers, detectives, sergeants, lieutenants, inspectors or other supervisory officers, employed by the NYPD. Plaintiff, Mr. Samuel Mercado (“Mr. Mercado”), is a Black, African American, Hispanic or Latino male, and Plaintiff, Ms. Maribel Rivera (“Ms. Rivera”), is an African American, Black, Latina or Hispanic female. The defendants did not possess a judicially authorized warrant to arrest Plaintiffs and did not possess a lawfully obtained searc...

Vasquez, Marco vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 030630/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, September 21, 2020, ended October 8, 2021
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about July 13, 2019 at approximately 1:00 a.m. in the area of West Fordham Road and University Avenue Plaintiff was lawfully present when an unnamed PO arrived, approached, questioned, detained, and searched Plaintiff without legal justification. Plaintiff was ultimately arrested on the basis of false PO accusations. The officer and other POs (listed Defendants are Det. James R. Causa, Sgt. Vicente E. Perez, Undercover Officer 368, Det. Daniel Rivera, and John and James Doe) withheld their names and defaced a property receipt so their names could not be derived from it. Plaintiff's arrest was motivated by arrest quotas, and POs John and James Doe failed to intercede despite knowing the arrest was unlawful...

Johnson, J-Quan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV06915, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 14, 2015
Complaint, Second Amended Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was attending a block party and was on crutches after he underwent surgery on his Achilles tendon. Defendant Officers began dispersing the crowd and Plaintiff was crutching away when officer Powell pushed somebody into him, then slapped him. All Officers began to assault him with their fists and batons , causing severe damage to his injury, and dragged him for a block. Plaintiff was taken to the hospital and charged with Assault in the Second Degree.

Brooks, Andre, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV07495, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, November 6, 2013, ended January 15, 2015
$55,000 Settlement
Complaint, Second Amended Complaint, Stipulation
Description: On the night of August 25 and 26, 2012, Plaintiffs Brooks and Clark were lawfully present at the entrance of Hylan Park. Defendants, NYPD Officers Flores, Schantz, Imbert, Perez, Arana and Tiburcio, stopped Plaintiffs at gunpoint. Defendants directed Plaintiffs to lie on the ground, handcuffed them and arrested them. Defendants then searched plaintiffs' bodies via pat-down and searched their pockets. Plaintiffs were lying on the ground for 30 minutes. The defendant officers did not have a warrant authorizing the arrest of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs were then transported to the precinct and then subsequently to Bronx Central Booking where they were imprisoned until August 27, 2012. They were released without being c...

Fort, Andrew vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 306368/2012, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 28, 2012, ended March 6, 2018
$90,000 Settlement

Other Documents