Juan F. Rodriguez

Badge #4662, White Male, 50
Detective Grade 3 at 24th Precinct Detective Squad since January 2019, active
Also served at 20th Precinct
Service started January 2005, made $166,000 last year, Tax #937408

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force (2)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Untruthful Statement: False official statement


Lawsuit settlements:
$2,000   Haynes, Gene vs Lt. Raso, Michael, et al., 2017 EDNY EDNY 17CV03059
$70,000   Adams v. City of New York et al., NYCSC NYCSC 161678/2013
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
15 Allegations
6 Substantiated
5 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Complaint Withdrawn
7 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202107721, December 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: White Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: White Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202007510, November 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201306200, June 2013
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, March 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200916061, October 2009
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200803544, March 2008
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202107721, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other White Female Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Other White Female Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202007510, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Other Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201306200, June 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 55 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 55 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 55 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Male, 55 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 55 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, March 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200916061, October 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 16 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200803544, March 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 42 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Asian Male, 42 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2014-12197
Closed: 8/29/2014
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: On duty, abused his authority as a member of the New York City Police Department in that he stopped a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
  2. Guilty: On duty, abused his authority as a member of the New York City Police Department in that he frisked a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
  3. Guilty: On duty, abused his authority as a member of the New York City Police Department in that he searched a person known to the Department without sufficient legal authority.
  4. Guilty: On duty, did wrongfully use force against a person known to the Department.
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)

Case: 2010-2018
Closed: 2/2/2011
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Failed to properly safeguard his firearm.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, failed to voucher the New York state identification card of a person known to the Department.
Penalty: Vacation days (20 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $72,000 total settlements.

Haynes, Gene vs Lt. Raso, Michael, et al.
Case # 17CV03059, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 24, 2017, ended June 22, 2018
$2,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 18, 2016, P.O.s followed and stopped the Lyft car Plaintiff was in for no reason. P.O.s proceeded to interrogate and search Plaintiff while giving no reason for such actions. P.O. only informed Plaintiff that they were conducting a “safety check” because there had been recent robberies of cab drivers in the area.

Adams v. City of New York et al.
Case # 161678/2013, Supreme Court - New York
$70,000 Settlement
Complaint

Other Documents