Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
Michael M. Kemper
Also served at
Patrol Borough Brooklyn South,
Detective Bureau,
Detective Borough Brooklyn North,
75th Precinct
Service
started April 1991,
made $240,000 last year,
Tax #899418
White Male, 52
Complaints
4
Complaints
5
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Exonerated
1
Miscellaneous
2
Unfounded
Complaint #200106902,
September 2001
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female, 34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Penalty: | Instructions |
Complaint #200104592,
June 2001
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 45 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #9605572,
December 1996
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Nasty Words |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #9302179,
August 1993
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Curse |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Miscellaneous |
| Complaint #200106902, September 2001 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest | White Female, 34 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Penalty: Instructions | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200104592, June 2001 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone | White Male, 45 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #9605572, December 1996 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force | Unfounded | |
| Discourtesy: Nasty Words | Unfounded | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #9302179, August 1993 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Discourtesy: Curse | Miscellaneous | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Lawsuits
Cook, Frank, et Al vs City of New York, et al.Case # 501670/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, January 18, 2022