Frank Guidice

Badge #25187, White Male

Former Police Officer at 75th Precinct

Service started July 1999, Tax #923918

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word

Complaints

2 Complaints

6 Allegations

1 Substantiated

1 Substantiated (Charges)

1 Exonerated

4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200200095, January 2002

Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Force: Other blunt instrument as a club
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Penalty:	Instructions

additional details

Complaint #200102366, April 2001

Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant:	Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant:	Black Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #200200095, January 2002
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word	Hispanic Male, 31	Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force	Hispanic Male, 31	Unsubstantiated
Force: Other blunt instrument as a club	Hispanic Male, 31	Unsubstantiated
Force: Gun Pointed	Hispanic Male, 31	Exonerated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #200102366, April 2001
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object	Black Male, 19	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Black Male, 19	Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.