Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Gun Pointed
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Stop (2)
Force: Gun Pointed
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Stop (2)
Hiram A. Nieves
Badge #10194,
Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 48th Precinct since May 2021
Service
started November 2020,
made $72,500 last year,
Tax #970028
Complaints
2
Complaints
9
Allegations
5
Substantiated
4
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Substantiated (Charges)
2
Unable to Determine
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202408777,
August 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 15-17 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
Complaint #202206493,
September 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Gun Pointed |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| Complainant: | Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
| Complaint #202408777, August 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 18-20 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 15-17 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 15-17 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202206493, September 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Gun Pointed | Black Male, 18-20 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 18-20 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Black Male, 18-20 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Male, 18-20 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 18-20 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Male, 18-20 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Urena, Amaury vs The City of Ny, et al.Case # 24CV01880, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 3, 2024, ended November 17, 2025
Zero Disposition