Joseph Quinlan

Badge #5669, White Male
Former Detective Grade 2 at Warrant Section
Service started October 1990, ended September 2010, Tax #898328

Complaints

5 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200814834, October 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200717487, December 2007
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200600620, January 2006
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200506426, June 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9202582, August 1992
Allegation: Discourtesy: Profane Gesture
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200814834, October 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question Male, 28 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200717487, December 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Female, 47 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200600620, January 2006
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200506426, June 2005
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9202582, August 1992
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Profane Gesture Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.