Michael E. Windsor

Badge #5648, Black Male, 59
Detective Grade 1 at Detective Borough Brooklyn North Homicide Squad since June 2017, active
Also served at 77th Precinct
Service started April 1997, made $217,000 last year, Tax #919828

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Discourtesy: Word

Lawsuit settlements:
$5,001   Remy, Shervaughn vs City of New York, et al., 2014 EDNY EDNY 14CV02851
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
9 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200502758, March 2005
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #200400969, January 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200401009, January 2004
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200206710, October 2002
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200000765, February 2000
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Female, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9901623, April 1999
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200502758, March 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 40 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 40 Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #200400969, January 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone Black Male, 27 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200401009, January 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200206710, October 2002
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 36 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200000765, February 2000
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Female, 18 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Female, 18 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9901623, April 1999
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $5,001 total settlements.

Harrell, Moe- Leek vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 506354/2018, Supreme Court - Kings, March 30, 2018

Remy, Shervaughn vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV02851, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 12, 2014, ended September 16, 2014
$5,001 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On February 14, 2013, Plaintiff turned himself in at the 77th Precinct in Brooklyn, NY, where he was arrested by Defendant Officers including Windsor. The next day, ADA Gratton instructed arresting officer Windsor to release Plaintiff. Defendant proceeded to detain Plaintiff until he was arraigned on February 17, 2013, a detention of about 63 hours. Plaintiff was released from custody, without bail.

Brock, Mandel vs Detective Windsor
Case # 13CV06311, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, November 29, 2013, ended May 20, 2015
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On August 18, 2012, Plaintiff was leaving court in Manhattan Criminal Court, on an unrelated charge, when he was informed there was an icard/ecard, an unconstitutional arrest warrant issued by Windsor of the 77th Precinct in Brooklyn, NY. Plaintiff was refused legal representation when requested and was told Detectives only wanted to talk to him. Plaintiff stated he did not want to talk to them and wanted to leave. He was told the Detective put a hold (non-judicial warrant) on him and he could not leave. Plaintiff asked what the charges were and was refused any answers. Two plain clothes officers arrived and informed Plaintiff he was under arrest for a violation of an order of protection in Brooklyn, NY. Plaint...

Other Documents