Connor R. Keane

Connor R. Keane

Connor R. Keane
Badge #26409, White Male
Police Officer at 60th Precinct Domestic Violence Squad since July 2026
Also served at 60th Precinct
Service started January 2019, made $152,000 last year, Tax #967138

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29455
Closed: 3/22/2024
Case: 2022-26961
Closed: 10/10/2022
Case: 2021-24499
Closed: 1/15/2022

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
7 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202405211, May 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202206511, September 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202102460, March 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: White Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202405211, May 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Black Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202206511, September 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises White Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card White Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) White Male, 50-54 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force White Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202102460, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged White Female, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29455
Closed: 3/22/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A

Case: 2022-26961
Closed: 10/10/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely activate body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2021-24499
Closed: 1/15/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Tolbert, Anita vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 513301/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, May 9, 2023
Complaint
Description: On December 1, 2019, Plaintiff was driving her vehicle to drop a friend off at her house. Immediately after Plaintiff’s friend exited the vehicle, Defendant Officers approached Plaintiff with their guns drawn. Upon approach, Defendant Officers immediately directed Plaintiff to hand over her driver’s license and registration, to which Plaintiff inquired as to the reason why Defendants were asking for her license and registration. Defendant Officers stated that the vehicle was double parked and obstructing traffic. Shortly thereafter, Defendant Officers forcibly grabbed Plaintiff, pulling and pushing her, and proceeded to tightly handcuff Plaintiff with her hands placed behind her back. Defendant Officers proceed...