Frank S. Galia

Badge #24153, White Male
Former Police Officer at Midtown North Precinct
Service started July 2001, ended July 2026, Tax #928338

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number

Complaints

5 Complaints
11 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 SRAD Closure
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202511072, October 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Korean Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202412330, November 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: White Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: White Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.25 days)
additional details

Complaint #201607215, August 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200609916, July 2006
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200307627, September 2003
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202511072, October 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Korean Male, 40-44 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202412330, November 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 60-64 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Action White Male, 60-64 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property White Male, 60-64 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 60-64 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 0.25 days)
additional details
Complaint #201607215, August 2015
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200609916, July 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 28 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 28 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 28 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200307627, September 2003
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Male, 29 Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.