Denis Cekic

Denis Cekic

Denis Cekic
Badge #11429, White Male
Police Officer at 32nd Precinct since July 2015, active
Service started January 2013, made $122,000 last year, Tax #953738

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Discourtesy: Word

Complaints

3 Complaints
12 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Complainant Unavailable
4 Unable to Determine
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202303867, September 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202205738, August 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201906242, July 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202303867, September 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202205738, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 55-59 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 55-59 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201906242, July 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 30 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 30 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 30 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 30 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits.

Alhanafi, Rayhanah vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 157069/2020, Supreme Court - New York, September 8, 2020

Scott, Alvin, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 150184/2020, Supreme Court - New York, February 11, 2020

Maradiaga, Jeronimo, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV08325, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 26, 2016, ended October 1, 2020
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: The plaintiffs were on the sidewalk, as part of participation in a cop watch patrol, were observing and video recording a traffic checkpoint set up by the defendant officers. The plaintiffs were told by the officers to leave, but refused. The officers handcuffed them and took them to the 32nd Precinct and charged with Obstructing Governmental Administration in the Second Degree. The charges were adjourned in contemplation of dismissal.