Emilio M. Perez

Emilio M. Perez

Emilio M. Perez
Badge #11652, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 45th Precinct since May 2022
Service started January 2019, made $149,000 last year, Tax #967248

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Pepper spray (2)
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-29977
Closed: 3/6/2024

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Unfounded
6 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202409889, September 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Filipino Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Filipino Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202404789, May 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Radio as club
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202311188, November 2023
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Complaint #202207747, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Complaint #202409889, September 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Filipino Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Filipino Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202404789, May 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Radio as club Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202311188, November 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Pepper spray Hispanic Male, 50-54 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Pepper spray Hispanic Female, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Pepper spray Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details
Complaint #202207747, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Hispanic Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-29977
Closed: 3/6/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully damaged property.
Recommendation: No disciplinary action