Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Wallace, Timmy vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 22CV03414,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 15, 2022
Complaint
Wilson, Darnell vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 029552/2020E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, January 28, 2021
Complaint
Description: On or about October 3, 2018 Plaintiff was walking up stairs to a friend's apartment when he was tackled from behind and thrown down several stairs by PO Alejandro Azcona, Detective Shaun Odonnell, Sergeant Oliver Castillo, and PO Jane Doe. Plaintiff suffered substantial injury to his left shoulder, right wrist, back, head, and face. Plaintiff was handcuffed and arrested, even though he had not acted in a threatening or violent manner or engaged in any criminal activity during or before his arrest. Plaintiff was take to the 48 Precinct, where he was kept for several hours before being transported to a hospital for the numerous injuries sustained during his arrest. Plaintiff was arraigned at the hospital and char...