Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Mohammed A. Ahmed
Badge #2613,
Asian Male
Police Officer at Headquarters Security since October 2025
Also served at
Transit Bureau Manhattan,
Transit Bureau District 3,
Field Training Unit,
90th Precinct
Service
started April 2018,
made $182,000 last year,
Tax #965648
Complaints
2
Complaints
7
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
6
Closed - Pending Litigation
Complaint #202303152,
April 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Force: Chokehold |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Force: Hit against inanimate object |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Force: Restricted Breathing |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
| Complainant: | Asian Female, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202302891,
February 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Complaint #202303152, April 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Hispanic Male, 18-20 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Force: Chokehold | Hispanic Male, 18-20 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Force: Hit against inanimate object | Hispanic Male, 18-20 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Force: Restricted Breathing | Hispanic Male, 18-20 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 18-20 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Asian Female, 18-20 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202302891, February 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Female, 60-64 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Ruffin, Milton vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 503659/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, May 28, 2024
Complaint
Description: On February 5, 2021, Plaintiff was living in a shelter in Brooklyn when NYPD officers entered the shelter and unlawfully stopped, frisked, and questioned all occupants, including the Plaintiff. The officers claimed to be searching for individuals with outstanding warrants and falsely arrested the Plaintiff based on a warrant from the 1980s, which had long been inactive. Despite no probable cause, the Plaintiff was handcuffed, detained, and transported to the 90th Precinct, and later to Rikers Island, where he was held until February 18, 2021, without ever seeing a judge or receiving due process. During his detention, the Plaintiff was subjected to strip searches, contracted COVID-19, and was sprayed with a chem...
Meeks, Kenneth vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 503658/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, May 20, 2024
Complaint
Description: On February 5, 2021, the Plaintiff was living in a shelter in Brooklyn when NYPD officers entered the shelter and unlawfully stopped, frisked, and questioned all occupants, including the Plaintiff. The officers claimed they were searching for individuals with outstanding warrants. They falsely arrested the Plaintiff, alleging there was an outstanding warrant from 1984, which had been closed long ago. Despite the Plaintiff informing them he was on parole and had no warrants, the officers handcuffed and detained him. He was taken to the precinct and then Rikers Island, where he was held for two weeks without due process or a court appearance. During this time, the Plaintiff was subjected to intrusive strip search...