Conclusion Meanings:
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 6 known lawsuits, $35,000 total settlements.
Palmer, O'neil vs The City of New York Et. al.
Case # 516582/2026,
Supreme Court - Kings, June 29, 2026
David, Zane vs P.O. Paulino, Andrew
Case # 516714/2026,
Supreme Court - Kings, June 15, 2026
Guerrero, Lorandis vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 823973/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, November 14, 2025
Amoah, Augustine & Adu, Nana vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 818560/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, September 2, 2025
Donaldson, Kevin, et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 516258/2025,
Supreme Court - Kings, May 20, 2025
Gibbs, Trumane Anthony vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 509702/2024,
Supreme Court - Kings, April 5, 2024, ended July 18, 2024
$35,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about September 3, 2023, Plaintiff was a passenger in the rear seat of a care when Defendant POs in an unmarked NYPD vehicle, without its lights or sirens on, crashed into the vehicle wherein Plaintiff was passenger. Plaintiff was injured in the crash and exited the car. When Plaintiff noticed that the drivers of the other car were Defendant POs, Plaintiff placed his hands on his head. Defendant POs then accosted, seized, assaulted, and handcuffed Plaintiff. Defendant Paulino punched Plaintiff in the face 4-5 times. Defendant POs did not have probable cause to search or arrest Plaintiff. However, Plaintiff was transported to a precinct and then Central Booking, where he requested medical care. His request...