Dennis Cobic

Dennis Cobic

Dennis Cobic
Badge #1132, White Male
Police Officer at 112th Precinct Detective Squad since July 2025
Also served at 112th Precinct
Service started December 2020, made $88,300 last year, Tax #970458

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Question
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Complaints

1 Complaint
8 Allegations
5 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202303981, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Asian Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Asian Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: Asian Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Asian Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Asian Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Complainant: Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Age)
Complainant: Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, December 6, 2024
Penalty: Command Discipline A 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202303981, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Asian Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Question Asian Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Asian Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Asian Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Asian Female, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin) Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Age) Female, 70-74 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 45-49 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, December 6, 2024
Penalty: Command Discipline A 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Singh, Jaspreet, et al. vs City of New Yor, et al.
Case # 26CV00342, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 10, 2026

Perry, Sonia vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV02914, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 30, 2025