Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Discourtesy: Other (2)
Offensive Language: Other
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Discourtesy: Other (2)
Offensive Language: Other
Key D. Matiascastillo
Badge #4127,
Hispanic Male
Detective Grade 3 at Warrant Section since March 2024
Also served at
49th Precinct
Service
started October 2019,
made $123,000 last year,
Tax #968620
Complaints
2
Complaints
7
Allegations
4
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
3
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2
Exonerated
1
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202401226,
February 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Other |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Other |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Other |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Closed: Retained, with discipline |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Retained, with discipline, August 1, 2025 |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline A 3 days |
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary |
| Complaint Closing Report | |
| NYPD Case Retained Letter |
Complaint #202005965,
September 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #202401226, February 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Other | Hispanic Female, 60-64 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Female, 60-64 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Offensive Language: Other | Hispanic Female, 60-64 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Discourtesy: Other | Hispanic Female, 60-64 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, August 1, 2025 | ||
| Penalty: Command Discipline A 3 days | ||
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary | |
| Complaint Closing Report | ||
| NYPD Case Retained Letter | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202005965, September 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording | Hispanic Male, 18-20 | Exonerated |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Hispanic Male, 18-20 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property | Hispanic Male, 18-20 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Corretjer, Angel vs City of Ny, et al.Case # 809591/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 20, 2022
Complaint
Description: On or about July 3, 2021, while Angel Corretjer (Plaintiff) was lawfully operating his motor vehicle, she was stopped, detained and arrested by the NYPD police officers and then taken and transported by NYPD and jailed at the 49th Precinct, without any valid right or grounds therefore. At the lime of defendant's unlawful arrest and imprisonment, plaintiff had not committed or attempted to commit any illegal act. On the next day, defendants issued a desk appearance ticket requiring plaintiff to be present, report and to appear in Court on July 23, 2021 for further and continued prosecution of the charges for which he was wickedly, falsely and maliciously accused, arrested, detained, jailed. Then, defendants rele...