Matthew R. Simpson

Matthew R. Simpson

Matthew R. Simpson
Badge #5604, White Male
Sergeant at 116th Precinct since May 2026
Service started July 2014, made $153,000 last year, Tax #957168

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29450
Closed: 4/18/2024

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
13 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
4 Unsubstantiated
5 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202208611, October 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details

Complaint #202204273, June 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202202983, May 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202106646, October 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202001797, November 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
Complainant: White Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: White Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201700786, January 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202208611, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Penalty: Command Discipline - A (Vacation: 1 day)
additional details
Complaint #202204273, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202202983, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202106646, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202001797, November 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Female, 45-49 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital White Female, 45-49 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name White Female, 45-49 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201700786, January 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 16 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 16 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29450
Closed: 4/18/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Fletcher, Charles vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 715705/2021, Supreme Court - Queens, November 30, 2021
Complaint
Description: On or about August 29, 2018, the plaintiff was in a clothing store. After browsing, he went to leave but was locked in, forcibly detained, and assaulted by three store employees who accused him of shoplifting. During this time, the plaintiff was struck about his body and sustained physical injuries. The employees called the police, and P.O. Simpson of the 103rd Precinct arrived and conducted a cursory investigation. After searching the plaintiff's backpack and determining he had not stolen anything, the plaintiff requested P.O. Simpson to arrest the three employees who had assaulted and unlawfully detained him. Instead of arresting the employees, P.O. Simpson arrested the plaintiff and charged him with criminal...