Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2023-29450
Closed: 4/18/2024
Case Details:
-
Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Fletcher, Charles vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 715705/2021,
Supreme Court - Queens, November 30, 2021
Complaint
Description: On or about August 29, 2018, the plaintiff was in a clothing store. After browsing, he went to leave but was locked in, forcibly detained, and assaulted by three store employees who accused him of shoplifting. During this time, the plaintiff was struck about his body and sustained physical injuries. The employees called the police, and P.O. Simpson of the 103rd Precinct arrived and conducted a cursory investigation. After searching the plaintiff's backpack and determining he had not stolen anything, the plaintiff requested P.O. Simpson to arrest the three employees who had assaulted and unlawfully detained him. Instead of arresting the employees, P.O. Simpson arrested the plaintiff and charged him with criminal...