James Hu

James Hu

James Hu
Badge #18657, Asian Male
Police Officer at 111th Precinct since December 2019, active
Also served at 115th Precinct, 114th Precinct
Service started January 2007, made $118,000 last year, Tax #943378

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26997
Closed: 3/28/2023

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$52,000   Gilliam, Shawn Sr. vs City of New York, et al., 2013 EDNY EDNY 12CV06416
View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
13 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Complaint Withdrawn
3 Exonerated
5 Unfounded

Complaint #202102994, May 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: White Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: White Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: White Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202004957, July 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201701299, February 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 50
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201610505, December 2016
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201310540, November 2013
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201115420, November 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 69
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: White Male, 69
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200809894, June 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202102994, May 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card White Male, 65-69 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name White Male, 65-69 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number White Male, 65-69 Unfounded
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202004957, July 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201701299, February 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 50 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201610505, December 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 49 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201310540, November 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 48 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 48 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #201115420, November 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 69 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number White Male, 69 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200809894, June 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 25 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Female, 25 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Female, 25 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26997
Closed: 3/28/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
  2. Wrongfully deactivated their body-worn camera.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training


Lawsuits

Gilliam, Shawn Sr. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 12CV06416, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 18, 2013, ended May 6, 2014
$52,000 Settlement
Complaint, Stipulation
Description: On September 30, 2011, in the vicinity of 10th Street, Queens, NY, plaintiff was driving in his car with his fiancé. Defendants Pizzino and Doe approached and stopped the car without cause. Defendant officers demanded to see plaintiff’s driver’s license and registration. Plaintiff went to get the documents, but the defendant officers grabbed him from the car, and threw him on the ground, and when plaintiff complained they pepper sprayed him. Officers handcuffed plaintiff so tight that they cut into his wrists. More officers arrived, including named defendants, and some of them struck plaintiff while others looked on. Plaintiff was transported to Elmhurst Hospital Center, then to the 114th Precinct. Plaintiff th...

Other Documents