Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Michael Ryan
Badge #4476,
White Male
Police Officer at Transit Bureau Manhattan since September 2025
Also served at
Transit Bureau District 3
Service
started April 2019,
made $144,000 last year,
Tax #967678
Lawsuit Settlements:
$60,000 Morel, Dionny vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 NYCSC NYCSC 161187/2023
View Details
$60,000 Morel, Dionny vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 NYCSC NYCSC 161187/2023
View Details
Complaints
2
Complaints
4
Allegations
2
Substantiated
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202208724,
December 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202208649,
December 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Complaint #202208724, December 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202208649, December 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2024-30444
Closed: 5/14/2024
Case Details:
- Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
- Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Lawsuits
Morel, Dionny vs City of Ny, et al.Case # 161187/2023, Supreme Court - New York, January 6, 2023, ended February 5, 2025
$60,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 26, 2023, Plaintiff was lawfully in the vicinity of West 191st Street and St. Nicholas Avenue when Defendant Officers Amandeep Kaur, Michael Ryan, Muzli Kastrati, and others, without probable cause, approached, searched, handcuffed, seized, and arrested Plaintiff in an excessive manner and with excessive force. All criminal actions against Plaintiff were terminated favorably by dismissal.