Dustin I. Olivos

Dustin I. Olivos

Dustin I. Olivos
Badge #19950, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Military and Extended Leave Desk since June 2023, active
Also served at 83rd Precinct
Service started July 2011, made $116,000 last year, Tax #950978

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force (2)

Lawsuit settlements:
$20,000   Belizario, Samuel vs City of New York, et al., 2015 EDNY EDNY 14CV07085
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
7 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202101023, January 2021
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202000909, January 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201907786, August 2019
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202101023, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Hispanic Male, 35-39 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202000909, January 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201907786, August 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 35-39 Exonerated
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Belizario, Samuel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV07085, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 9, 2015, ended December 7, 2015
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 6, 2014, the plaintiff, Samuel Belizario, brought his son to an NYPD precinct in compliance with a court order relating to custody of his son. His son tried to follow him out of the precinct, and was forcibly restrained by the defendant NYPD officers. Mr. Belizario asked them to be careful with his son and took out his phone to record the way the defendants were restraining his son. Defendant Sergeant "Serrano" tried to grab Mr. Belizario's phone, made contact with Mr. Belizario's hand, and falsely accused Mr. Belizario of hitting her. Mr. Belizario apologized. The defendants slammed Mr. Belizario's phone to the ground, damaging it, and grabbed Mr. Belizario and pushed him to the ground. He was arrested,...

Other Documents