Ahmed A. Mourad

Ahmed A. Mourad

Ahmed A. Mourad
Badge #2197, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Warrant Section since October 2022
Also served at 123rd Precinct
Service started January 2016, made $155,000 last year, Tax #960978

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2016-16284
Closed: 11/15/2016

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
10 Allegations
4 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Exonerated
1 SRAD Closure
1 Unable to Determine
2 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202508917, July 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202403074, January 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202204572, July 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202103648, June 2021
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202508917, July 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 35-39 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202403074, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202204572, July 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202103648, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Vehicle Male, 21-24 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Male, 21-24 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Male, 21-24 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2016-16284
Closed: 11/15/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Failed to reside as required within the city of New York or westchester, rockland, orange, putnam, nassau or suffolk counties.
Penalty: Vacation days (20 days)