John D. Gumpel

Badge #4290, White Male, 54

Sergeant Special Assignment at Candidate Assessment Division since January 2019

Also served at 110th Precinct, 103rd Precinct

Service started July 2004, made $164,000 last year, Tax #934978

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2014-12760

Closed: 2/10/2015

Case: 2014-11514

Closed: 2/9/2015

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$10,000 Diaz, Guzman vs City of New York, et al., 2015 EDNY EDNY 15CV01842
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints

6 Allegations

2 Substantiated

2 Substantiated (Charges)

1 Exonerated

3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201307741, June 2013

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant:	Black Male, 48
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant:	Black Male, 48
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion:	APU Guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty:	Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty:	Forfeit vacation 6 days
APU Case Status:	Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, May 26, 2016
Penalty:	Forfeit vacation 6 days

additional details

Complaint #201214793, December 2012

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant:	Asian Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant:	Asian Female, 30
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion:	APU Guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty:	Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty:	Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status:	Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, February 17, 2016
Penalty:	Forfeit vacation 3 days

additional details

Complaint #200703345, March 2007

Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

additional details

Complaint #201307741, June 2013
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Black Male, 48	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Black Male, 48	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, May 26, 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 6 days
additional details
Complaint #201214793, December 2012
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Asian Male, 28	Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Asian Female, 30	Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, February 17, 2016
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
additional details
Complaint #200703345, March 2007
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed	Hispanic Male, 20	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Stop	Hispanic Male, 20	Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.

Discipline

Case: 2014-12760

Closed: 2/10/2015

Case Details:

Guilty: Searched a vehicle without sufficient legal authority.

Penalty: Vacation days (6 days)

Case: 2014-11514

Closed: 2/9/2015

Case Details:

Guilty: While on-duty, wrongfully searched a person known to the Department's vehicle without sufficient legal authority.

Penalty: Vacation days (3 days)

Diaz, Guzman vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV01842, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 10, 2015, ended August 27, 2015
$10,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Non-Party woman told Defendant Damjanac that Plaintiff had violated an order of protection, despite clear evidence otherwise, Damjanac issued a Domestic Incident Report approved by Defendants Taylor and Andruszkiewicz. When Plaintiff went to court for the child custody dispute, he was arrested, searched, taken to the 114th Precinct by Defendants Adamiszyn and Gumpel, who later voided his arrest and released him.

John D. Gumpel

Complaints

Conclusion Meanings:

Discipline

Lawsuits

Other Documents