Joseph J. Jacobsen

Badge #23247, White Male
Police Officer at 75th Precinct since December 2017
Service started October 2016, made $165,000 last year, Tax #962498

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25536
Closed: 12/2/2022
Case: 2022-25537
Closed: 11/17/2022

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
13 Allegations
4 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
5 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202307060, July 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202102264, March 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202004324, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, June 15, 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202003196, May 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202307060, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202102264, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #202004324, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 40-44 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 40-44 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 40-44 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male Exonerated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, June 15, 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202003196, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25536
Closed: 12/2/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongfully searched a vehicle.
  3. Wrongfully threatened to arrest an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2022-25537
Closed: 11/17/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits.

Avent, Shauntea vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 519540/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, August 20, 2024
Complaint
Description: On or about April 19, 2023 Plaintiff, who was eight months pregnant, was lawfully driving a vehicle when PO Joshua E. Conseillant, PO Joseph J. Jacobsen, and PO John Doe stopped Plaintiff's car without justification. After Plaintiff provided POs with requested documentation, POs informed Plaintiff she was the subject of an investigation card ("i-card") and ordered her out of the vehicle. Plaintiff complied with every request but after PO searched--without recovering contraband--her POs Conseillant and Jacobsen roughly grabbed Plaintiff's arms, causing pain to Plaintiff's shoulders and arms. PO Conseillant also shoved Plaintiff, who was pregnant, against the patrol car, causing pain to Plaintiff's arm, shoulder,...

Ragland, Craig Millington vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 535201/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, December 8, 2022
Complaint
Description: On June 4, 2021, Plaintiff was a passenger in a lawfully parked vehicle in Brooklyn when defendant NYPD Officers, including MARC WHIRL, JOSEPH JACOBSEN and other unknown officers, unlawfully stopped, questioned, searched, and falsely arrested Plaintiff without probable cause or legal justification. Defendants ordered Plaintiff to exit the vehicle and performed an illegal search of Plaintiff’s person, without any basis. Defendant Officers performed also an illegal search of the vehicle. They claimed having found a firearm whereas Plaintiff did not possess one. Plaintiff was grabbed, handcuffed and, transported to the 75th Police Precinct. 12h later, Plaintiff was transported to the central booking where he staye...

Cruz, Robert vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV03367, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, July 6, 2021
Complaint
Description: On March 18, 2020, Plaintiff was at a red light on his motorcycle, when Defendant Police Officer Anthony Varrone and other fellow Defendant Police Officers tackled Plaintiff from his bike, yelled profanities at him, and punched and kicked him. Throughout this incident and the arrest, Plaintiff requested medical attention but was repeatedly denied.

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional CCRB complaint #202001510