Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $186,500 total settlements.
Cuesta, Hamlet vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 036152/2017E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, December 28, 2017
Complaint
Description: On or about February 1, 2017, defendant NYPD officers Kenneth Flynn and Thomas Perez wrongfully and falsely arrested, detained and imprisoned plaintiff, and then wrongfully and falsely accused plaintiff of various crimes in order to maliciously prosecute him. Plaintiff sustained emotional injury as a result of this incident. All charges were dismissed on or about July 17, 2017.
Montero, Wanda vs Perez, Thomas, et al.
Case # 300605/2014,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 7, 2014, ended June 18, 2014
$32,500 Settlement
Allen, Shane et Al vs City of New York
Case # 021138/2012,
Supreme Court - Bronx, June 26, 2012, ended March 6, 2019
$154,000 Settlement
Correa v. City of New York et al
Case # 304959/2011,
Supreme Court - Bronx
Summons/Complaint
