Lawrence J. Granshaw

Lieutenant at 101st Precinct since May 2026
Service started July 2007, made $174,000 last year, Tax #944609
American Indian Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Disability)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Housing Status)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-24900
Closed: 5/9/2022
Case: 2021-23767
Closed: 10/19/2021

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$20,000   Rutledge, Johnny, et Al vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 EDNY EDNY 21CV04436
$70,000   Emiliano, Edgar, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2015 BCSC BCSC 304346/2015
$6,500   Stewart, Fay vs City of New York, et al., 2012 EDNY EDNY 12CV02792
$225,000   Biswas, Krittika vs City of New York, 2012 SDNY SDNY 12CV03607
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
19 Allegations
9 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
6 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Complainant Unavailable
1 Unfounded
6 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202511111, October 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202408879, August 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202404095, April 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: White Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Disability)
Complainant: Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: White Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Housing Status)
Complainant: White Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202300081, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202001162, February 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202511111, October 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 35-39 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Restricted Breathing Black Male, 35-39 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202408879, August 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Male, 55-59 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202404095, April 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Female, 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word White Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Female, 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation White Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Disability) Female, 15-17 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property White Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Housing Status) White Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202300081, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Female Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202001162, February 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Female, 70-74 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-24900
Closed: 5/9/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2021-23767
Closed: 10/19/2021
Case Details:
  1. Activity logs command operations
  2. Violated patrol rules.
  3. Failed to make proper notifications.
  4. Failed to supervise.
Penalty: C - Command Discipline, vacation days (13 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - C


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $321,500 total settlements.

P., V. Infant M/n/g Pechnikova, Anna vs Lopez, Steven, et al.
Case # 723264/2024, Supreme Court - Queens, November 7, 2024
Complaint
Description: On April 23, 2024, plaintiff and his mother were at a temporary housing shelter, where they were residing, when they were falsely imprisoned within the shelter by its employees. Defendant NYPD Officers Steven M. Lopez, Rawle Persad, Nicholas, Derles, and Lawrence Granshaw, then arrived and assaulted and battered plaintiff. In doing so, defendants disregarded plaintiff's autism spectrum disorder in a way that caused unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain. Defendants also searched plaintiff's property without probable cause or reasonable suspicion.

Rutledge, Johnny, et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV04436, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 16, 2021, ended July 3, 2022
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about August 30, 2018, defendant officers broke down the entrance door and stormed into plaintiffs' premises. They immediately handcuffed plaintiffs and placed them in the living room. Plaintiffs complained that the handcuffs were too tight but the officers refused to loosen them. The officers searched plaintiffs and found no contraband. Eventually, they forcibly removed plaintiffs from the premises and transported them to a precinct where they subjected plaintiffs to a visual body cavity search, forcing them to undress, bend over, and squat and cough, while naked. Still no contraband was found. The officers falsely stated to prosecutors that plaintiffs committed crimes. Upon arraignment, the charges agai...

Emiliano, Edgar, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 304346/2015, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 29, 2015, ended April 6, 2017
$70,000 Settlement

Stewart, Fay vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 12CV02792, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 17, 2012, ended October 8, 2013
$6,500 Settlement

Biswas, Krittika vs City of New York
Case # 12CV03607, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 20, 2012, ended September 16, 2014
$225,000 Settlement
Complaint

Other Documents