Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Daly-Fell, Tristan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 523859/2024,
Supreme Court - Kings, October 9, 2024
Complaint
Description: On June 6, 2023 at 4 pm, Plaintiff was in the front passenger seat of a legally parked vehicle near the intersection of Blake Ave and Hinsdale St., near 343 Hinsdale St., in Kings County, New York. Plaintiff exited the vehicle to return home, Defendant NYPD officers Collins, Haynes, Giudice, Stelmach and Zebro exited an unmarked police car and approached Plaintiff and the vehicle's driver. Plaintiff and the driver did not do any crimes, but Defendant Zebro ordered Plaintiff without cause to stop about one half block from the location where the vehicle was parked, which Plaintiff did. Defendants told Plaintiff to go back to the car, and Plaintiff complied. Plaintiff used his cellphone to record his encounter wit...
Browne, Kendall vs Zebro, James J. et al.
Case # 24CV02781,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 18, 2024
Campbell, Archie vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 529002/2022,
Supreme Court - Kings, October 13, 2022, ended April 23, 2024
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On April 16, 2022, Plaintiff was a passenger in his friend's car when Officers, without probable cause, pulled over the car, opened the passenger side door, grabbed the Plaintiff and forcibly pulled him out of the vehicle. Officers then roughly handcuffed and searched Plaintiff and threw him into the police car, slamming his foot against the car. They then transported him to the 75th Precinct. While Plaintiff was in custody, Officers falsely told the DA that Plaintiff was in criminal possession of a firearm and falsely accused him of other related charged. Furthermore, Plaintiff was suffering the rejection of his kidney implant and required medication and treatment which Officers knowingly delayed and refused t...