Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Case Details:
-
Body-worn camera violation.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, forfeiture of time/leave balances
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Williams, Richard vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 801092/2026E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 19, 2026
Ahmad, Rasheed vs Police, Dept of Nyc, et al.
Case # 000964/2024,
Supreme Court - Bronx, March 19, 2024
Salmon, Raheem, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 021665/2018E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 13, 2018
Complaint
Description: On January 28, 2017 at approximately 2:00 PM, Plaintiffs Raheem Salmon and Kevin Telpha were at the Jacobi medical Center where they arrived via ambulance after being attached by a civilian. Defendant Officers Tyson Sherman and Edgar Contreras arrived in uniform and began searching Plaintiffs without cause and found no drugs, weapons or contraband. Plaintiffs were placed under arrest and held at the local precinct and then central booking before being charged on false allegations provided by the Defendants.