Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) (2)
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) (2)
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest
Weber Wesh
Badge #2019,
Black Male
Sergeant at Transit Bureau Anti-Terrorism Unit since January 2026
Service
started January 2013,
made $149,000 last year,
Tax #954419
Lawsuit Settlements:
$14,000 Snow, Sean vs City of New York, et al., 2015 EDNY EDNY 15CV00041
View Details
$14,000 Snow, Sean vs City of New York, et al., 2015 EDNY EDNY 15CV00041
View Details
Complaints
2
Complaints
6
Allegations
3
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1
Exonerated
1
Unable to Determine
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202304298,
May 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Closed: Retained, without discipline |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Retained, without discipline, November 19, 2024 |
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary |
| Complaint Closing Report | |
| NYPD Case Retained Letter |
Complaint #201403448,
April 2014
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #202304298, May 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Abuse of Authority: Photography/Videography | Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) | Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, November 19, 2024 | ||
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary | |
| Complaint Closing Report | ||
| NYPD Case Retained Letter | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201403448, April 2014 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) | Black Male, 24 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Snow, Sean vs City of New York, et al.Case # 15CV00041, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 13, 2015, ended July 2, 2015
$14,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 10, 2014, plaintiff was driving his car and was stopped by NYPD officers. Plaintiff provided identification and was subsequently given a summons for reckless driving and excessively tinted windows. When plaintiff was cleared to leave, the car wouldn't start again so he got out and inspected under the car's hood checking the battery. Two defendant officers asked if everything was alright. Defendant officer Weber Wesh ordered plaintiff to move the car. Plaintiff said defendant officers would have to wait as the light was red. Plaintiff was then put in handcuffs. After complaining the handcuffs were too tight, plaintiff was then thrown into the back of the police car and defendant officers slammed the do...