Javiel R. Flores

Javiel R. Flores

Javiel R. Flores
Badge #5237, Hispanic Male
Also served at Narcotics Borough Bronx North, Narcotics Borough Bronx, 43rd Precinct
Service started April 2017, made $146,000 last year, Tax #963519

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force (2)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Lawsuit Settlements:
$82,500   Gonzalez, Yordy vs City of Ny, et al., 2023 BCSC BCSC 812837/2023E
View Details

Complaints

12 Complaints
33 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
5 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
1 OMB PEG Directive Closure
3 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
15 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202407865, August 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: White Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202406760, July 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202406763, July 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: American Indian Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: American Indian Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202400473, January 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202311734, December 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202407921, October 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, March 5, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202305241, May 2023
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202303642, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202205231, April 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202105052, August 2021
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202002720, April 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201909162, October 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202407865, August 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Female, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Gender White Female, 35-39 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202406760, July 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202406763, July 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force American Indian Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Hit against inanimate object American Indian Male, 21-24 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202400473, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 25-29 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202311734, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 35-39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202407921, October 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, March 5, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202305241, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Female, 60-64 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Female, 60-64 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Female, 60-64 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Question Female, 60-64 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 60-64 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Female, 60-64 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202303642, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 21-24 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202205231, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202105052, August 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202002720, April 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201909162, October 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $82,500 total settlements.

Marks, Emanuel vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 820690/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 18, 2024

Williams, Jomauri vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 817138/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 25, 2024
Complaint
Description: On October 10, 2023, NYPD officers Flores, Rodrigo, Black, Feliz and others approached Plaintiff for no reason other than his race and/or age and summarily stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered and detained him in an aggressive and excessive manner. Plaintiff was taken to a police station and processed as under arrest. He remained incarcerated for over 24 hours and was required to make numerous court appearances over an extended period of time until all charges against him were terminated favorably.

Gonzalez, Yordy vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 812837/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 21, 2023, ended April 18, 2024
$82,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 25, 2023, Yordy Gonzalez was lawfully in the area of 2167 Cross Bronx Expressway in Bronx County. Without probable cause or provocation, or any legal justification, Defendant officers Gilcalderon, Doe, Roe and Flores falsely accused Mr. Gonzalez of having committed a crime. Defendant officers touched, grabbed, handcuffed, seized and arrested Mr. Gonzalez in an excessive manner and with excessive force. Eventually, Mr. Gonzalez was taken to a police station and entered into the records as under arrest. Mr. Gonzalez was held on various criminal charges at various police stations, correctional facilities and at the Courthouse in Bronx County. Ultimately, the criminal action against Yordy Gonzalez was term...

Fernandez, Jornalist Pena vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 812130/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, September 21, 2021
Complaint
Description: On October 4, 2020, Plaintiff Journalist Pena Fernandez was lawfully present at or about the premises of 1530 White Plains Road in Bronx County when Plaintiff was approached, assaulted and battered by Defendant NYPD Police Officers, including Randy Dominguez, Dino Vucetovic, and Javiel Flores. Plaintiff was transported to Jacobi Hospital for treatment of his injuries while under police custody, then was transported to the 43rd Precinct. Plaintiff brings claims of: assault and battery, negligent hiring and retention, false arrest, false imprisonment, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, malicious prosecution, and civil rights violation.

Green, Kimala vs Village Super Market of New York, Llc Dba Shoprite of Bruckner Blvd., et al.
Case # 033505/2019, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 20, 2019, ended July 16, 2021
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On November 16, 2018, Plaintiff Kimala Green was shopping at Shoprite in Buckner when a security guard employed by Shoprite falsely detained her, falsely accused her of shoplifting and called the New York City Police. Defendant Officer "John" (first name unknown) Flores, arrived and arrested Plaintiff on charges of petit larceny. He then took Plaintiff to the local precinct where she was searched and placed in a holding cell. Plaintiff was formally charged with petit larceny and released the same day and on July 16, 2028, all charges were dismissed. As a result of the arrest, Plaintiff was denied employment when a prospective employer noted the arrest on a background check.