Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Igor Pinkhasov
Inspector at Patrol Borough Queens North since May 2026
Service
started July 2004,
made $248,000 last year,
Tax #935519
White Male
Complaints
2
Complaints
5
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1
Unfounded
3
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202501918,
February 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Restricted Breathing |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202207025,
September 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Complaint #202501918, February 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | Black Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Restricted Breathing | Black Male, 30-34 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202207025, September 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Hispanic Female, 50-54 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises | Hispanic Female, 50-54 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 4 known lawsuits.Achary, Jagannadhan vs Achary, Varsha, et al.
Case # 700397/2025, Supreme Court - Queens, January 30, 2025
Adams, Dea vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV03956, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, July 15, 2021
Complaint
Bellony, Bernard vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV05127, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 20, 2018, ended June 18, 2019
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On June 13, 2016, a shooting took place at a playground in Brooklyn. Plaintiff had nothing to do with this. Nonetheless, defendant police officers manufactured evidence and altered witness testimony causing plaintiff to be falsely arrested and incarcerated for one year, two months and 23 days. Additionally, plaintiff was libeled and defamed in newspapers citywide. All charges against plaintiff were dismissed on January 8, 2018.
Rodriguez, Giovanni A/k/a Karrot, King vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV04805, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 18, 2018, ended November 16, 2021
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On May 15, 2017, plaintiff was walking down the street when he was hit by a stray bullet intended for members of a gang. Plaintiff was taken to a hospital, where NYPD Detective Bernard Solomon, Officer Edwin Baez, and Detective Sean Smith searched plaintiff and seized his clothes and cell phone, which were never returned to him. Without justification, Sergeant Ventura, NYPD Detective Solomon, Captain Pinkhasov, Detective Jeffrey Scalf, Sergeant Leo Nugent, Detective Smith, Detective Chandler, Detective Mendez, and Officer Baez, labeled plaintiff a “gang member” and placed him in the NYPD’s gang database. Individuals listed in the database are subjected to different treatment by law enforcement officers than in...