Christian J. Prate

Christian J. Prate

Christian J. Prate
Badge #21233, White Male
Police Officer at Patrol Borough Queens North Neighborhood Safety Team since December 2025
Also served at 115th Precinct, Patrol Borough Queens North Public Safety Teams
Service started April 2021, made $95,200 last year, Tax #971619

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29614
Closed: 5/8/2024

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
14 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
4 Closed - Pending Litigation
3 Complainant Unavailable
3 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded

Complaint #202508224, June 2025
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202405591, May 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202311859, December 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202207643, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Immigration Status)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, May 6, 2024
Penalty: Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202107827, December 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202508224, June 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Hispanic Male, 30-34 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30-34 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30-34 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202405591, May 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202311859, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Restricted Breathing Black Male, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202207643, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin) Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Immigration Status) Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, May 6, 2024
Penalty: Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details
Complaint #202107827, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 50-54 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29614
Closed: 5/8/2024
Case Details:
  1. Bias-based policing.
  2. Failed to take police action/render police services.
  3. Wrongfully deactivated their body worn camera.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (3 days)
Recommendation: No disciplinary action


Lawsuits

Grant, Elizabeth, et Al vs Aspca, et al.
Case # 22CV00775, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 2, 2022, ended July 12, 2023
Zero Disposition