Christian J. Prate

Christian J. Prate

Christian J. Prate
Badge #21233, White Male
Police Officer at 115th Precinct since October 2021, active
Service started April 2021, made $63,500 last year, Tax #971619

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Complaints

3 Complaints
10 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
3 Closed - Pending Litigation
3 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded

Complaint #202311859, December 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202207643, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202107827, December 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202311859, December 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Restricted Breathing Black Male, 35-39 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202207643, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (National Origin) Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202107827, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 50-54 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Grant, Elizabeth, et Al vs Aspca, et al.
Case # 22CV00775, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 2, 2022, ended July 12, 2023
Zero Disposition