Carlos Cosme

Badge #11911, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at Military and Extended Leave Desk
Also served at 9th Precinct
Service started October 1990, ended February 2012, Tax #897819


Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200612317, July 2006
Allegation: Force: Other blunt instrument as a club
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9601379, February 1996
Allegation: Force: Punch/Kick
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #9505438, November 1995
Allegation: Force: Punch/Kick
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Nasty Words
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200612317, July 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Other blunt instrument as a club Male Exonerated
Force: Physical force Male Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9601379, February 1996
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Punch/Kick Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #9505438, November 1995
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Punch/Kick Unsubstantiated
Force: Other - Force Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Nasty Words Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2010-1816
Opened: 7/7/2010
Closed: 1/31/2012
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully ingested methadone without police necessity
  2. Guilty: Wrongfully possessed methadone without police necessity
  3. Guilty: While off duty wrongfully consumed an intoxicant to the extent that said officer was unfit for duty
  4. Guilty: While off duty wrongfully consumed alcohol to the extent that said officer was unfit for duty
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of time/leave balances, thirty-one (31) pre-trial suspension days, service retirement on completion of twenty (20) years.