Joseph F. Agramonte

Badge #25196, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 50th Precinct since March 2021
Service started January 2020, made $92,800 last year, Tax #968919

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 10/2/2024
Case: 2 Allegations

View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
7 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Unable to Determine
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202500906, January 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202401603, January 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Detention
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202300927, January 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202102118, March 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202500906, January 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Hispanic Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202401603, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Detention Hispanic Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202300927, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202102118, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Black Male Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 10/2/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate BWC in a timely manner
  2. Failed to terminate a vehicle pursuit
Penalty: C - Command Discipline, vacation days (9 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - C


Lawsuits

Carew, Brian vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 805267/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 23, 2024
Complaint
Description: On March 30, 2021 at 12:30AM, Defendant Police Officer Joseph Agramonte, Police Officer Damian Santiago, Sergeant James Rahill, together with unnamed police officers John Does responded to a neighbor's 911 call to the apartment of Plaintiff, located in the Bronx, New York. The 911 call resulted from a verbal argument Plaintiff had with his wife where the frustrated Plaintiff damaged property in the apartment. Plaintiff in no way injured or assaulted his wife, child, or anyone else. Defendants arrested Plaintiff using excessive force, injuring his knee, triggering an asthma attack, and applied the handcuffs in an excessively tight manner. Plaintiff was transported to Jacobi Hospital to receive treatment for h...