Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $245,000 total settlements.
Kreek, Matthew vs Humann, Robert, et al.
Case # 18CV12154,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 24, 2018, ended October 26, 2021
$70,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 27, 2017, at about 4am, Plaintiff was awakened by the sound of pounding at his door. Two officers asked to enter his apartment, and said they did not have a warrant, so Plaintiff denied their request. Defendants Police Officers Robert Humann (Tax No. xx6749), Paul Mondone (Tax No. xx8020), Allyssa Hayesman (Shield No. 17070), Daniel Gravitch (Shield No. 1162), Capt. Daniel Miraglia, Timothy Craft (Shield No. 5161), Ryan Norman (Tax No. xx4029), Robert McGee (Tax No. xx3983), James Coll (Tax No. xx8865), and other unknown named officers shortly thereafter entered without cause and without warrant Plaintiff's apartment through his windows by cutting his window screens and breaking the locks and through hi...
Charles, Leston vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 11CV02783,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, May 17, 2011, ended February 21, 2015
$175,000 Settlement
