Samuel Ducker

Badge #15991, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at Transit Bureau Brooklyn Task Force
Service started July 1989, ended March 2010, Tax #910429

Complaints

5 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200914907, September 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Female, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200005658, August 2000
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #9601139, March 1996
Allegation: Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #6393054, February 1993
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #6393012, January 1993
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200914907, September 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 26 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Female, 26 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200005658, August 2000
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 24 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #9601139, March 1996
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Beat Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #6393054, February 1993
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #6393012, January 1993
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.