Jonathan Guillen

Jonathan Guillen

Jonathan Guillen
Badge #4327, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 24th Precinct since January 2019
Service started October 2017, made $170,000 last year, Tax #964539

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-27482
Closed: 2/8/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$46,500   Ramos De Almeida, Adelia vs City of Ny, et al., 2022 SDNY SDNY 22CV02792
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
8 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202311401, November 2023
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Housing Status)
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202200125, January 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 70-74
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202102832, May 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202311401, November 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Housing Status) Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202200125, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 70-74 Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202102832, May 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Female, 60-64 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Female, 60-64 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-27482
Closed: 2/8/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make proper notifications.
  2. Failed to make required entries in Department logs (command log, roll call, activity log, vehicle movement/utilization, radio log, vehicle assignment, dv activity log).
  3. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
  4. Wrongful removal to a hospital
  5. Wrongfully used physical force
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Ramos De Almeida, Adelia vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 22CV02792, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, April 6, 2022, ended March 28, 2023
$46,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 9, 2021, the plaintiff called 911 to report that a security guard in her apartment building had struck her in the arm. Officers Freund and Guillen responded to her apartment about 7 hours after the initial 911 call. The officers entered her apartment without asking and without receiving consent. The officers refused to socially distance as a precaution against COVID-19. The plaintiff requested other officers to take the report as she felt uncomfortable with Freund and Guillen. The officers refused to leave and instead called for an ambulance. She was upset by the situation but was not acting erratically. The plaintiff insisted she did not need medical attention and did not want to go to the hospital. The...