Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Olga Dudka
Badge #23501,
White Female
Police Officer at COD Discovery Liaison Unit since December 2025
Service
started January 2019,
made $186,000 last year,
Tax #967049
Lawsuit Settlements:
$975,000 Britt, Ruben vs Dudka, Olga, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 521690/2020
$875,000 Sloane, Kwesi M. vs Dudka, Olga, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 516030/2020
$40,000 Jones, Jerome, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 509142/2020
View Details
$975,000 Britt, Ruben vs Dudka, Olga, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 521690/2020
$875,000 Sloane, Kwesi M. vs Dudka, Olga, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 516030/2020
$40,000 Jones, Jerome, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2020 KCSC KCSC 509142/2020
View Details
Complaints
4
Complaints
9
Allegations
2
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2
Complainant Uncooperative
2
Exonerated
2
Unable to Determine
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202508197,
June 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Property damaged |
| Complainant: | Female, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #202503517,
March 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202302891,
February 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Male, 55-59 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Female, 60-64 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #201910324,
November 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Nonlethal restraining device |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Force: Nonlethal restraining device |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Not guilty |
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 10 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, August 25, 2025 |
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary |
| Complaint Closing Report | |
| NYPD Trial Decision |
| Complaint #202508197, June 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property | Female, 35-39 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Property damaged | Female, 35-39 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202503517, March 2025 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202302891, February 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Hispanic Female, 60-64 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Male, 55-59 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Female, 60-64 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201910324, November 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Nonlethal restraining device | Black Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | Black Male, 30-34 | Exonerated |
| Force: Nonlethal restraining device | Black Male, 30-34 | Exonerated |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty | ||
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, August 25, 2025 | ||
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary | |
| Complaint Closing Report | ||
| NYPD Trial Decision | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $1,890,000 total settlements.Britt, Ruben vs Dudka, Olga, et al.
Case # 521690/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, November 17, 2020, ended January 25, 2023
$975,000 Settlement
Sloane, Kwesi M. vs Dudka, Olga, et al.
Case # 516030/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, September 8, 2020, ended January 25, 2023
$875,000 Settlement
Jones, Jerome, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 509142/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, June 25, 2020, ended April 23, 2024
$40,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 31, 2019, the plaintiff was lawfully present on Flushing Avenue in Kings County, New York City, when Police Officer Olga Dudka and the unknown John and Jane Doe officers approached and intentionally assaulted and battered the plaintiff without probable cause. This assault caused severe, permanent injuries that resulted in the plaintiff's disability and significant psychological trauma. The officers then forcibly grabbed and handcuffed the plaintiff, leading to a false arrest and unlawful confinement. The incident caused the plaintiff humiliation, damage to their reputation, and considerable physical and emotional distress. Additionally, the police officers submitted a false report to cover up their acti...