Jamar C. Burke

Jamar C. Burke

Jamar C. Burke
Badge #18983, Black Male
Police Officer at 67th Precinct Detective Squad since July 2026
Also served at 77th Precinct, 120th Precinct
Service started July 2015, made $167,000 last year, Tax #958349

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-30590
Closed: 5/16/2024

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
11 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202507044, June 2025
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202402236, October 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202308108, August 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Puerto Rican Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202300475, January 2023
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202003751, October 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202507044, June 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 45-49 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202402236, October 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Hispanic Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202308108, August 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Puerto Rican Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202300475, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Force: Restricted Breathing Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202003751, October 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital White Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-30590
Closed: 5/16/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Training