Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Gun Pointed
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Force: Gun Pointed
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Rupak K. Dey
Badge #19319,
Asian Male
Police Officer at Highway Unit 03 since October 2022
Also served at
Transportation Bureau Highway District,
60th Precinct,
67th Precinct,
Highway Unit 02
Service
started October 2016,
made $153,000 last year,
Tax #962359
Complaints
5
Complaints
12
Allegations
2
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1
Complainant Unavailable
1
Complainant Uncooperative
1
SRAD Closure
4
Unfounded
3
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202605942,
June 2026
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #202302502,
March 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Action |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property |
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202203840,
May 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Gun Pointed |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Not guilty |
| APU Plea Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 10 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Resolved by plea, April 9, 2026 |
| Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 10 days |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
Complaint #201904487,
May 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
Complaint #201901937,
February 2019
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 23 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Complaint #202605942, June 2026 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Female, 40-44 | SRAD Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202302502, March 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Discourtesy: Action | Male, 21-24 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 21-24 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 21-24 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property | Male, 21-24 | Unfounded |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202203840, May 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Gun Pointed | Black Male, 18-20 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Black Male, 18-20 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property | Black Male, 18-20 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | Black Male, 18-20 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty | ||
| APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, April 9, 2026 | ||
| Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days | ||
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201904487, May 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Male, 34 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201901937, February 2019 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Female, 23 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Lubin, Jacob vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 524706/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, September 27, 2022
Complaint
Description: On August 30, 2019 at approximately 9:00 pm, the defendants, police officers of the New York Police Department, unlawfully stopped and searched the plaintiff, Jacob Lubin in the vicinity of 1402 Brooklyn Avenue, Brooklyn, New York. The plaintiff was playing basketball with friends when officers of the NYPD, including Sergeant David Grieco (shield #3830) ordered Mr. Lubin and his friends to leave the basketball courts in Nostrand Park. Mr. Lubin then went with his friends to the Flatbush Gardens Apartment complex. When Sergeant Grieco observed Mr. Lubin and his friends conversing in the courtyard of the building, he and his team proceeded to harrass, stop, search and, without a court-ordered warrant or probable ...
Nicholson, Jamel vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 524707/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, September 27, 2022
Complaint
Description: On August 30, 2019, the plaintiff, Jamel Nicholson, was legally present in the courtyard of 1402 Brooklyn Avenue, Brooklyn NY 11210, when the defendant police officers, without a court-ordered warrant or probable cause, stopped, searched and arrested Mr. Nicholson. The defendants unlawfully transported Mr. Nicholson against his will to the 67th precinct, where he was further processed and detained for many hours. Mr. Nicholson was then transported to Kings County Central Booking where he was detained until his release from custody on the next day. Mr. Nicholson's rights guaranteed under the Constitution were violated, in part, due to the New York Police Department's inability to stop the use of the unconstituti...