Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Kevin N. Ramotar
Badge #6669,
Black Male
Police Officer at 60th Precinct since September 2025
Also served at
US Open Tennis Detail
Service
started April 2022,
made $82,300 last year,
Tax #974459
Complaints
6
Complaints
10
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
7
Closed - Pending Litigation
1
Complainant Unavailable
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202605089,
May 2026
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Force: Chokehold |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Force: Restricted Breathing |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202512040,
November 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202508266,
July 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Nonlethal restraining device |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Force: Nonlethal restraining device |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202505959,
May 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Chokehold |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
Complaint #202405211,
May 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Penalty: | Command Discipline - A |
Complaint #202400805,
January 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Complaint #202605089, May 2026 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Force: Chokehold | Black Male, 30-34 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Force: Restricted Breathing | Black Male, 30-34 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202512040, November 2025 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 35-39 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202508266, July 2025 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Nonlethal restraining device | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Force: Nonlethal restraining device | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202505959, May 2025 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Chokehold | Black Female, 45-49 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202405211, May 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Penalty: Command Discipline - A | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202400805, January 2024 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search | Within NYPD Guidelines | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.