Edwin A. Reyesestrada

Edwin A. Reyesestrada

Edwin A. Reyesestrada
Badge #2874, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 42nd Precinct since September 2021, active
Also served at US Open Tennis Detail
Service started April 2019, Tax #967659

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital

Lawsuit settlements:
$24,000   Ojeda, Annabella vs City of New York, et al., 2021 SDNY SDNY 21CV05775
$72,000   Gilliam, Marcus, et Al vs Lynch, Patrick, et al., 2021 SDNY SDNY 21CV05263
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
8 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
4 Unfounded

Complaint #202201682, March 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202107483, July 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: White Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, June 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
additional details

Complaint #202001278, January 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202000408, January 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202201682, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black, 35-39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202107483, July 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital White Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, June 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A
additional details
Complaint #202001278, January 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 55 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 55 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 55 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202000408, January 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $96,000 total settlements.

Ojeda, Annabella vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 21CV05775, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, July 22, 2021, ended July 1, 2022
$24,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 15, 2020, plaintiff was working her shift at Shake Shack. P.O. Precious Cummings placed a pick-up order and complained that her milkshake tasted strange. In response, the store manager gave her and other officers with her coupons for free meals. Another group of officers, including P.O.s Genesis Nova-Diaz and Edwin Reyes-Estrada, arrived and placed milkshake orders, and later claimed falsely that they had been poisoned. Yet another group of officers, including P.O.s Elliot Zinstein and Brian Query, arrived and declared the area to be a "crime scene." Plaintiff and 4 other Shake Shack employees were instructed to remain at the premises. An unidentified officer demanded to see plaintiff's identific...

Gilliam, Marcus, et Al vs Lynch, Patrick, et al.
Case # 21CV05263, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 17, 2021, ended August 4, 2022
$72,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 15, 2020, three officers ordered shakes from Shake Shack at Fulton Transit center. Officers complained their shake did not taste right and complained to plaintiff Gilliam, who offered them vouchers as an apology. The order was placed on the mobile app, so employees could not have known the order was from officers. Yet the officers accused plaintiffs of putting a toxic substance in their milkshake. However, the officers did not get sick or exhibit any signs of ingesting a toxic substance. Yet, Sergeant Zinstein set up a crime scene at the Shake Shack and detained all employees. Plaintiff cooperated and allowed them to search the premise and watch surveillance video and provided them samples from the shak...