Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Edwin A. Reyesestrada
Badge #2874,
Hispanic Male
Also served at
US Open Tennis Detail
Service
started April 2019,
Tax #967659
Lawsuit settlements:
$24,000 Ojeda, Annabella vs City of New York, et al., 2021 SDNY SDNY 21CV05775
$72,000 Gilliam, Marcus, et Al vs Lynch, Patrick, et al., 2021 SDNY SDNY 21CV05263
View Details
$24,000 Ojeda, Annabella vs City of New York, et al., 2021 SDNY SDNY 21CV05775
$72,000 Gilliam, Marcus, et Al vs Lynch, Patrick, et al., 2021 SDNY SDNY 21CV05263
View Details
Complaints
4
Complaints
8
Allegations
2
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Complainant Uncooperative
1
Unable to Determine
4
Unfounded
Complaint #202201682,
March 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Black, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202107483,
July 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
Complaint #202001278,
January 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 55 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 55 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 55 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202000408,
January 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Complaint #202201682, March 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black, 35-39 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Black, 35-39 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202107483, July 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | White Male, 40-44 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) | |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202001278, January 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Black Male, 55 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Black Male, 55 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 55 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202000408, January 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 25-29 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $96,000 total settlements.Ojeda, Annabella vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 21CV05775, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, July 22, 2021, ended July 1, 2022
$24,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 15, 2020, plaintiff was working her shift at Shake Shack. P.O. Precious Cummings placed a pick-up order and complained that her milkshake tasted strange. In response, the store manager gave her and other officers with her coupons for free meals. Another group of officers, including P.O.s Genesis Nova-Diaz and Edwin Reyes-Estrada, arrived and placed milkshake orders, and later claimed falsely that they had been poisoned. Yet another group of officers, including P.O.s Elliot Zinstein and Brian Query, arrived and declared the area to be a "crime scene." Plaintiff and 4 other Shake Shack employees were instructed to remain at the premises. An unidentified officer demanded to see plaintiff's identific...
Gilliam, Marcus, et Al vs Lynch, Patrick, et al.
Case # 21CV05263, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 17, 2021, ended August 4, 2022
$72,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 15, 2020, three officers ordered shakes from Shake Shack at Fulton Transit center. Officers complained their shake did not taste right and complained to plaintiff Gilliam, who offered them vouchers as an apology. The order was placed on the mobile app, so employees could not have known the order was from officers. Yet the officers accused plaintiffs of putting a toxic substance in their milkshake. However, the officers did not get sick or exhibit any signs of ingesting a toxic substance. Yet, Sergeant Zinstein set up a crime scene at the Shake Shack and detained all employees. Plaintiff cooperated and allowed them to search the premise and watch surveillance video and provided them samples from the shak...