Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Jamel C. Crawford
Badge #7706,
Black Female
Service
started October 2000, ended November 2025,
Tax #926759
Lawsuit Settlements:
$45,000 Beaumont, Gregory vs City of New York, et al., 2016 NYCSC NYCSC 159123/2016
View Details
$45,000 Beaumont, Gregory vs City of New York, et al., 2016 NYCSC NYCSC 159123/2016
View Details
Complaints
2
Complaints
3
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1
Unable to Determine
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202303535,
April 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202204065,
June 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Action |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Complaint #202303535, April 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | Male, 35-39 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202204065, June 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Action | Hispanic Female, 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case Details:
- Guilty: Wrongfully engaged in a personal domestic incident while on-duty
- Guilty: While on-duty, went to two (2) locations to conduct personal business
- Guilty: While on-duty in king's country, utilized Department personnel and a Department automobile to travel to two (2) locations for non-Department purposes
- Guilty: While on-duty in King's County, failed to indicate specific locations visited and the time of arrival at each location in her activity log
Penalty: Forfeiture of ten (10) vacation days
Lawsuits
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $45,000 total settlements.Canuelas, Jacqueline vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 158791/2023, Supreme Court - New York, October 10, 2024
Canuelas, Jacqueline vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 158791/2024, Supreme Court - New York, October 10, 2024
Beaumont, Gregory vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 159123/2016, Supreme Court - New York, December 23, 2016, ended February 18, 2020
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 31, 2015, Detective Jamel Crawford intentionally and falsely accused the plaintiff of having committed Assault in the First Degree and related charges. The arrest was without cause or provocation. The plaintiff was conscious of his confinement, which was not authorized by any warrant, order, or legal right, and never consented to it. The plaintiff was transported to a precinct, where he was searched and forced to remain in a precinct cell. The plaintiff was then taken to New York Country Central Booking and was later released from custody. All charges against the plaintiff were dismissed. The plaintiff thus suffered several injuries, including emotional distress, humiliation, and fear and intimidation f...