Luis F. Siguencia

Luis F. Siguencia

Luis F. Siguencia
Badge #5401, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 43rd Precinct since July 2021
Service started December 2020, made $76,400 last year, Tax #970859

Substantiated Allegations:
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Lawsuit Settlements:
$30,000   Lambert, Michael vs City of Ny, et al., 2025 BCSC BCSC 809609/2025E
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
10 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Unavailable
6 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202403206, March 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202308719, September 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Asian Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Asian Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Asian Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant: Asian Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202304687, May 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202202357, March 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202201507, February 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202403206, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202308719, September 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Asian Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Asian Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Asian Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Asian Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Offensive Language: Gender Asian Male, 35-39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202304687, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202202357, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Age 30-34 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202201507, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Female Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $30,000 total settlements.

Lambert, Michael vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 809609/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 29, 2025, ended March 6, 2026
$30,000 Settlement

Swinton, Lenny vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 814142/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, September 9, 2024
Complaint
Description: On February 22, 2023, at a private residence in the Bronx, NYPD Officers, including Defendant Officer Siguencia, arrived at the apartment of Plaintiff Lenny Swinton's girlfriend, whereupon they violently beat upon the door until let in, at which point they arrested Plaintiff on the false basis that he had violated a protection order which in fact did not exist. During the car ride to the precinct, Defendants driving recklessly caused Plaintiff to slam his shoulder and head against the backseat window, causing an injury -- later diagnosed as whiplash injury syndrome -- that required medical attention. At the precinct, Plaintiff was told there was a warrant out for his arrest, but after being brought before a ju...