Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Arthur Cenci
Badge #22028,
White Male
Police Officer at 115th Precinct since June 2026
Also served at
FIFA World Cup,
US Open Tennis Detail
Service
started January 2007,
made $194,000 last year,
Tax #943069
Complaints
3
Complaints
11
Allegations
2
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Alleged Victim Unavailable
5
Complainant Uncooperative
2
Unfounded
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202302306,
March 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
| Complainant: | White Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | White Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
| Complainant: | White Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording |
| Complainant: | White Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Closed: Retained, with discipline |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Retained, with discipline, September 18, 2024 |
| Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 1 days |
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary |
| NYPD Case Retained Letter |
Complaint #201109236,
July 2011
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 23 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Alleged Victim Unavailable |
Complaint #200818132,
December 2008
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Complaint #202302306, March 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | White Male | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | White Male | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | White Male | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | White Male | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording | White Male | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, September 18, 2024 | ||
| Penalty: Forfeit vacation 1 days | ||
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary | |
| NYPD Case Retained Letter | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201109236, July 2011 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 23 | Alleged Victim Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200818132, December 2008 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | Hispanic Male | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Hispanic Male | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Discourtesy: Word | Hispanic Male | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Hispanic Male | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | Hispanic Male | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Closed: 9/16/2024
Case Details:
- Interfere with a recording device.
- Violated patrol rules.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications
Lawsuits
Cartagena, Saul vs City of New York, et al.Case # 012584/2011, Supreme Court - Queens, May 25, 2011, ended January 27, 2014
Administrative Closing